5/25/2018 9:23:54 AM
looks like rebuildTransitions doesn't expect any UNCANCEL event.
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Alexandre Meyer <pierre@mouraf.org>
|
5/25/2018 6:50:24 AM
Pierre-Alexandre Meyer <pierre@mouraf.org>
|
5/24/2018 6:50:43 AM
fetching the catalog over and over again: when we already have the plan,
we can directly fetch the phase.
This also fixes the implementation of rebuildSubscriptionAndNotifyBusOfEffectiveImmediateChange:
we cannot simply take the old subscription events and add the new event because in some cases, we
have had to de-active some events on disk (e.g. future phase event during a change plan).
It looks like we were incorrectly building subscription events in some cases, even though it didn't
affect most codepaths.
As a side effect, a "spiced-up test" had to be modified (creating garbage data on disk now throws an exception
as the code refuses to build such incorrect timelines).
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Alexandre Meyer <pierre@mouraf.org>
|
5/24/2018 6:07:56 AM
on 0.19.x.
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Alexandre Meyer <pierre@mouraf.org>
|
5/24/2018 4:21:11 AM
Meyer <pierre@mouraf.org>
|
5/24/2018 1:26:24 PM
into work-for-release-0.19.x
|
5/24/2018 12:00:53 AM
not exist. Fixes #906
|
5/23/2018 4:19:03 PM
into work-for-release-0.19.x
|
|
|
5/23/2018 2:59:30 PM
into work-for-release-0.19.x-doc
|
